Profanity is a socially offensive use of language, which may also be called cursing, cussing or swearing, cuss words (American English vernacular), curse words, swear words, bad words, dirty words, or expletives. Accordingly, profanity is language use that is sometimes deemed impolite, rude, or culturally offensive. It can show a debasement of someone or something, or be considered an expression of strong feeling towards something. Some words may also be used as intensifiers.
In its older, more literal sense, "profanity" refers to a lack of respect for things that are held to be sacred, which implies anything inspiring or deserving of reverence, as well as behaviour showing similar disrespect or causing religious offense.
The term profane originates from classical Latin profanus, literally "before (outside) the temple", "pro" being outside and "fanum" being temple or sanctuary. It carried the meaning of either "desecrating what is holy" or "with a secular purpose" as early as the 1450s. Profanity represented secular indifference to religion or religious figures, while blasphemy was a more offensive attack on religion and religious figures, considered sinful, and a direct violation of The Ten Commandments. Moreover, many Bible verses speak against swearing. In some countries, profanity words often have Pagan roots that after Christian influence were turned from names of deities and spirits to profanity and used as such, like famous Finnish profanity word perkele, which was believed to be an original name of the thunder god Ukko, the chief god of the Finnish pagan pantheon.
Profanities, in the original meaning of blasphemous profanity, are part of the ancient tradition of the comic cults which laughed and scoffed at the deity or deities: an example of this would be Lucian's Dialogues of the Gods satire.
In English, swear words and curse words like shit have a Germanic root, as likely does fuck, though damn and piss come from Old French and ultimately Latin. The more technical and polite alternatives are often Latin in origin, such as defecate or excrete (for shit) and fornicate or copulate (for fuck). Due to the stereotype of English profanity being largely Germanic, profanity is sometimes referred to colloquially as "Anglo-Saxon", in reference to the oldest form of English. This is not always the case. The word "wanker" is considered profane in Britain, but it dates only to the mid-20th century.
The history of curse words and profanity was part of spoken words in the medieval era. The word fuck was likely first used in English (borrowed) in the fifteenth century, though the use of shit in English is much older, rooted in the Proto-Germanic word skit-, then evolved in Middle English to the word schitte, meaning excrement and shiten, to defecate. Another profanity, damn, has its origins in Latin with the word damnum meaning to damage, hurt or harm.
Analyses of recorded conversations reveal that an average of roughly 80–90 words that a person speaks each day – 0.5% to 0.7% of all words – are curse words, with usage varying from 0% to 3.4%. In comparison, first-person plural pronouns (we, us, our) make up 1% of spoken words.
A three-country poll conducted by Angus Reid Public Opinion in July 2010 found that Canadians swear more often than Americans and British when talking to friends, while Britons are more likely than Canadians and Americans to hear strangers swear during a conversation.
Swearing performs certain psychological functions, and uses particular linguistic and neurological mechanisms; all these are avenues of research. Functionally similar behavior can be observed in chimpanzees, and may contribute to our understanding, notes New York Times author Natalie Angier. Angier also notes that swearing is a widespread but perhaps underappreciated anger management technique; that "Men generally curse more than women, unless said women are in a sorority, and that university provosts swear more than librarians or the staff members of the university day care center". Swearing over time may gain roots as a habit with the involuntary utterance of obscene words or socially inappropriate and derogatory remarks. This has been referred to as coprolalia, which is an occasional characteristic of tic disorders.
Keele University researchers Stephens, Atkins, and Kingston found that swearing relieves the effects of physical pain. Stephens said "I would advise people, if they hurt themselves, to swear". However, the overuse of swear words tends to diminish this effect. The Keele team won the Ig Nobel Peace Prize in 2010 for their research.
A team of neurologists and psychologists at the UCLA Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research suggested that swearing may help differentiate Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia.
A group of researchers from Wright State University studied why people swear in the online world by collecting tweets posted on Twitter. They found that cursing is associated with negative emotions such as sadness (21.83%) and anger (16.79%) thus showing people in the online world mainly use curse words to express their sadness and anger towards others.
An interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Warsaw investigated bilingual swearing: why is it easier to swear in a foreign language? Their finding that bilinguals strengthen the offensiveness of profanities when they switch into their second language, but soften it when they switch into their first tongue, but do both statistically significantly only in the case of ethnophaulisms (ethnic slurs) led the scientist to the conclusion that switching into the second language exempts bilinguals from the social norms and constraints (whether own or socially imposed) such as political correctness, and makes them more prone to swearing and offending others.
Types by purpose
- Abusive swearing, intended to offend, intimidate or otherwise cause emotional or psychological harm
- Cathartic swearing, used in response to pain or misfortune
- Dysphemistic swearing, used to convey that the speaker thinks negatively of the subject matter and to make the listener do the same
- Emphatic swearing, intended to draw additional attention to what is considered to be worth paying attention to
- Idiomatic swearing, used for no other particular purpose, but as a sign that the conversation and relationship between speaker and listener is informal
Slurs vs profanity
Already mentioned is that profanity is socially offensive and is considered to be strongly impolite. Slurs, however, are derogatory, as they are meant to harm another individual. Although profanity has been seen to improve performance or relieve anxiety and anger, and can be used in a lighthearted way, it is not the same with slurs. By definition, slurs are considered profanity because they are socially offensive and strongly impolite. When using profanity they can be taken lightheartedly.
For example: "If I don't get an A on this exam, I'm fucked."
In the example, the word "fucked" is profanity; however, the way it is embedded is not intended to offend anything, as the speaker is not making an offensive claim.
In every Australian state and territory it is a crime to use offensive, indecent or insulting language in or near a public place. These offences are classed as summary offences. This means that they are usually tried before a local or magistrates court. Police also have the power to issue fixed penalty notices to alleged offenders. It is a defence in some Australian jurisdictions to have "a reasonable excuse" to conduct oneself in the manner alleged .
In Brazil, the Penal Code does not contain any penalties for profanity in public immediately. However, direct offenses against one can be considered a crime against honor, with a penalty of imprisonment of one to three months or a fine. The analysis of the offense is considered "subjective", depending on the context of the discussion and the relationship between the parts.
Section 175 of Canada's Criminal Code makes it a criminal offence to "cause a disturbance in or near a public place" by "swearing […] or using insulting or obscene language". Provinces and municipalities may also have their laws against swearing in public. For instance, the Municipal Code of Toronto bars "profane or abusive language" in public parks. In June 2016, a man in Halifax, Nova Scotia, was arrested for using profane language at a protest against Bill C-51.
Sections 294A and 294B of Indian penal code have legal provisions for punishing individuals who use inappropriate or obscene words (either spoken or written) in public that are maliciously deliberate to outrage religious feelings or beliefs. In February 2015, a local court in Mumbai asked police to file a first information report against 14 Bollywood celebrities who were part of the stage show of All India Bakchod, a controversial comedy stage show known for vulgar and profanity based content. In May 2019 during the election campaign, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi listed out the abusive words the opposition Congress party had used against him and his mother during their campaign.
In January 2016, a Mumbai-based communications agency initiated a campaign against profanity and abusive language called "Gaali free India" (Gaali is the Hindi word for profanity). Using creative ads, it called upon people to use swatch (clean) language on the lines of Swachh Bharat Mission for nationwide cleanliness. It further influenced other news media outlets who further raised the issue of abusive language in the society especially incest abuses against women, such as "mother fucker".
In New Zealand, the Summary Offences Act 1981 makes it illegal to use "indecent or obscene words in or within hearing of any public place". However, if the defendant has "reasonable grounds for believing that his words would not be overheard" then no offence is committed. Also, "the court shall have regard to all the circumstances pertaining at the material time, including whether the defendant had reasonable grounds for believing that the person to whom the words were addressed, or any person by whom they might be overheard, would not be offended".
The Department of Education in the Philippine city of Baguio expressed that while cursing was prohibited in schools, children were failing to imbibe[clarification needed] it at home. Thus as part of its anti profanity initiative, in November 2018, the Baguio City government in the Philippines passed an anti profanity law that prohibits cursing and profanity in areas of the city frequented by children. This move was welcomed by educators and the Department of Education (DepEd) in Cordillera.
- In public
Swearing, in and of itself, is not usually a criminal offence in the United Kingdom although in context may constitute a component of a crime. However, it may be a criminal offence in Salford Quays under a public spaces protection order which outlaws the use of "foul and abusive language" without specifying any further component to the offence, although it appears to be unclear as to whether all and every instance of swearing is covered. Salford City Council claims that the defence of "reasonable excuse" allows all the circumstances to be taken into account. In England and Wales, swearing in public where it is seen to cause harassment, alarm or distress may constitute an offence under section 5(1) and (6) of the Public Order Act 1986. In Scotland, a similar common law offence of breach of the peace covers issues causing public alarm and distress.
- In the workplace
In the United Kingdom, swearing in the workplace can be an act of gross misconduct under certain circumstances. In particular, this is the case when swearing accompanies insubordination against a superior or humiliation of a subordinate employee. However, in other cases, it may not be grounds for instant dismissal. According to a UK site on work etiquette, the "fact that swearing is a part of everyday life means that we need to navigate away through a day in the office without offending anyone, while still appreciating that people do swear. Of course, there are different types of swearing and, without spelling it out, you really ought to avoid the 'worst words' regardless of who you’re talking to". Concerning swearing between colleagues, the site explains that "although it may sound strange, the appropriateness [of] swearing [...] is influenced largely by the industry you are in and the individuals you work with". The site continues to explain that, even in a workplace in which swearing is the norm, there is no need to participate in it. The site stresses that swearing is, in general, more problematic in asymmetric situations, such as in the presence of senior management or clients, but it also mentions that a "holier than thou" attitude towards clients may be problematic.
The Guardian reported that "36% of the 308 UK senior managers and directors having responded to a survey accepted swearing as part of workplace culture", but warned about specific inappropriate uses of swearing such as when it is discriminatory or part of bullying behaviour. The article ends with a quotation from Ben Wilmott (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development): "Employers can ensure professional language in the workplace by having a well-drafted policy on bullying and harassment that emphasises how bad language has potential to amount to harassment or bullying."
In the United States, courts have generally ruled that the government does not have the right to prosecute someone solely for the use of an expletive, which would be a violation of his or her right to free speech enshrined in the First Amendment. On the other hand, they have upheld convictions of people who used profanity to incite riots, harass people, or disturb the peace. In 2011, a North Carolina statute that made it illegal to use "indecent or profane language" in a "loud and boisterous manner" within earshot of two or more people on any public road or highway was struck down as unconstitutional. In 2015, the US city of Myrtle Beach passed an ordinance that makes profane language punishable with fines up to $500 and/or 30 days in jail. An amount of $22,000 was collected from these fines in 2017 alone.
Minced oaths are euphemistic expressions made by altering or clipping profane words and expressions to make them less objectionable. Although minced oaths are often acceptable in situations where profanity is not (including the radio), some people still consider them profanity. In 1941, a judge threatened a lawyer with contempt of court for using the word darn.
Impact on society
While there is no evidence of harmful effects of swearing (for instance, that it leads to physical violence), there is research showing that swearing is associated with enhanced pain tolerance. The authors concluded that swearing prompts a fight-or-flight response and quashes the link between the fear of pain and the perception of pain itself.
Research by Jay and Janschewitz suggests that swearing emerges by age two. By the time children enter school, they have a working vocabulary of 30-40 "offensive words", and their swearing becomes similar to that of adults around the age of 11 to 12.
It seems that there is no established consensus as to how children learn to swear, although it is an inevitable part of language learning, and begins early in life. Young school children may adopt various "toning down" strategies when swearing depending on the context in which they are talking.
A 2017 paper by Gilad Feldman and co-workers claimed to show a correlation between swearing and various measures of honesty. From three separate studies, the authors “found a consistent positive relationship between profanity and honesty; profanity was associated with less lying and deception at the individual level and with higher integrity at the society level”. However, the methodology of this study has been challenged by other psychologists, and the study is a subject of ongoing controversy.
In popular culture
- The Catcher in the Rye published in novel form in 1951 by J. D. Salinger became controversial for its use of the word fuck.
- Gone with the Wind, a 1939 film based on the novel by Margaret Mitchell includes the line "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn." This has been claimed to be the first use of profanity in a major American film, although films produced in America prior to 1935 occasionally used strong language and gestures.
- Seven Dirty Words is a 1972 comedy monologue by George Carlin in which he named the seven words that, he said, must never be used in a television broadcast.
- Kurt Vonnegut's use of the word motherfucker in his novel Slaughterhouse-Five became a subject of much controversy and led to his books being banned (and in some cases physically destroyed) by several public and school libraries.
- Comedian Lenny Bruce was arrested in 1961, 1962, and 1964 for obscenity and profanity in his comedic sets.
- British film director Ken Loach generated media debate with his 2002 film Sweet Sixteen, as the British Board of Film Classification gave it an 18 certificate for the very large amount of profanity, and not for any violent or sexual content. Loach argued that the language used was typical of the working classes in Greenock in Scotland and that the BBFC censors had a "London-centric view".
- Brandon Sanderson, in an annotation for his 2007 novel The Well of Ascension, mentions that some readers are put off by "light" cursing:
I’ve taken a little bit of criticism from certain readers for the swearing I put into these books. I know that most of you consider things like ‘damn’ and ‘hell’ to be very weak curses if even swear words at all. However, to some people, they can be offensive.
- Animal epithet
- Army creole
- Bleep censor
- Ethnic slurs
- Fighting words
- Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
- Grawlix: typographical symbols standing in for profanities (🤬 An emoji signifying profanity)
- Profanity in science fiction
- R v Penguin Books Ltd
- Sailor Mouth
- Seven dirty words
- Swear jar
- Verbal abuse
- "Definition of Profanity", Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, retrieved on 2014-08-31.
- Marquis, A.N. (1940). "The Monthly Supplement: a current biographical reference service, Volumes 1-2". The Monthly Supplement. United States: A.N. Marquis. 1–2: 337.
- "Definition of profanity". Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English – online. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- Oxford English Dictionary Online, "profane", retrieved 2012-02-14
- Harper, Douglas. "profane". Online Etymology Dictionary.
- "Bad Words [in the Bible]". OpenBible.info. Retrieved 30 April 2015.
- Siikala, Anna-Leena (2013). Itämerensuomalaisten mytologia. Helsinki: SKS.
- Salo, Unto (1990). Agricola's Ukko in the light of archeology. A chronological and interpretative study of ancient Finnish religion: Old Norse and Finnish religions and cultic place-names. Turku. ISBN 951-649-695-4.
- "Miten suomalaiset kiroilivat ennen kristinuskoa?". Retrieved 2015-12-25.
- Suomen kielen etymologinen sanakirja. 3. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura. 1976. ISBN 951-9019-16-2.
- Meletinsky, Eleazar Moiseevich The Poetics of Myth (Translated by Guy Lanoue and Alexandre Sadetsky) 2000 Routledge ISBN 0-415-92898-2 p.110
- Harper, Douglas. "shit". Online Etymology Dictionary.
- Harper, Douglas. "fuck". Online Etymology Dictionary.
- "Definition of Anglo-Saxon". Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English: Colloquialisms and Catch Phrases, Fossilised Jokes and Puns, General Nicknames, Vulgarisms and Such Americanisms As Have Been Naturalised. Eric Partridge, Paul Beale. Routledge, 15 Nov 2002
- wank. Online Etymology Dictionary.
- "shit | Search Online Etymology Dictionary". www.etymonline.com. Retrieved 2020-10-19.
- Nerbonne, G.Patrick; Hipskind, Nicholas M. (1972). "The use of profanity in conversational speech". Journal of Communication Disorders. 5: 47–50. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(72)90029-9.
- Jay, T. (2009). "The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words" (PDF). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 4 (2): 153–161. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x. PMID 26158942. S2CID 34370535. Retrieved 2012-11-19.
- Reid, Angus. (2010). Canadians Swear More Often Than Americans and British Archived 2012-03-08 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 2012-11-19
- Angier, Natalie (2005-09-25). "Cursing is a normal function of human language, experts say". New York Times. Retrieved 2012-11-19.
- Richard Stephens; John Atkins & Andrew Kingston (2009). "Swearing as a Response to Pain". NeuroReport. 20 (12): 1056–60. doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832e64b1. PMID 19590391. S2CID 14705045.
- Joelving, Frederik (2009-07-12), "Why the #$%! Do We Swear? For Pain Relief", Scientific American, doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1109-16b, retrieved 2012-11-19
- Ringman, JM; Kwon, E; Flores, DL; Rotko, C; Mendez, MF; Lu, P (2010). "The Use of Profanity During Letter Fluency Tasks in Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer Disease". Cognitive & Behavioral Neurology. 23 (3): 159–164. doi:10.1097/wnn.0b013e3181e11392. PMC 3594691. PMID 20829665.
- Damasio, Antonio (1994) Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. ISBN 978-0-399-13894-2
- "#Cursing Study: 10 Lessons About How We Use Swear Words on Twitter". Retrieved 2015-01-05.
- "Cursing in English on Twitter" Archived 2015-01-05 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 2015-01-05.
- Gawinkowska M, Paradowski MB, Bilewicz M (2013). "Second language as an exemption from sociocultural norms. Emotion-Related Language Choice revisited". PLOS ONE. 8 (12): e8122. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...881225G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081225. PMC 3859501. PMID 24349044.
- Pinker, Steven (2007) The Stuff of Thought. Viking Press. ISBN 978-0-670-06327-7
- Wong, Kristin (2017-07-27). "The Case for Cursing (Published 2017)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- "Pejorative Language | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- Methven, Elyse (2018). "A Little Respect: Swearing, Police and Criminal Justice Discourse". International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. 7 (3): 58–74. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i1.428. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- Methven, Elyse (2020). "Commodifying Justice: Discursive Strategies Used in the Legitimation of Infringement Notices for Minor Offences". International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique. 33 (2): 353–379. doi:10.1007/s11196-020-09710-z. S2CID 219441851. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- "Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) s 4A". AustLII. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- "Código Penal CP com jurisprudência unificada". brasil.mylex.net (in Portuguese). Retrieved 2018-05-11.
- "Calúnia, difamação e injúria: os crimes contra a honra". Blog de Wellington Saraiva (in Portuguese). 2013-06-12. Retrieved 2018-05-11.
- Canada’s weirdest laws: it’s illegal to swear in a Toronto park, FindLaw Canada.
- Nova Scotia man facing trial for swearing in public, thestar.com.
- "Indian Penal Code" (PDF). indiacode.nic.in. 1 May 1861. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
- "AIB Roast: Court asks to file FIR against Karan Johar, Deeepika Padukone, Aalia Bhat, Ranvir Singh & Arjun Kapoor". Moneylife NEWS & VIEWS. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
- PTI (May 8, 2019). "PM Modi lists out abuses hurled at him, says Congress did not even spare his mother". The Times of India. Retrieved 2019-09-05.
- "Three ad campaigns to watch out for on Republic Day". Indian Television Dot Com. 2016-01-25. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
- "Mother, sister, daughter... whose gaali is it anyway?". DNA India. 2016-02-21. Retrieved 2019-04-12.
- "Summary Offences Act 1981 No 113 (as at 01 March 2017), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz.
- Share; Twitter. "Educators only have good words for Baguio's anti-cursing law". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
- News, ABS-CBN. "Bawal magma: Anti-profanity ordinance passed in Baguio". ABS-CBNnews.com. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
- "Salford Council tries to outlaw swearing at The Quays".
- "Public Order Act 1986". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 2012-11-19.
- Swearing in the Workplace. Retrieved 2012-11-19.
- Work Etiquette – Swearing in the Workplace. Retrieved 2012-11-19
- Matt Keating (2006-06-03). "Should swearing be tolerated in the workplace?". Guardian. London. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
- How Swearing Works, HowStuffWorks.
- STATE’S ANTI-PROFANITY LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, ACLU.
- Staff, WPDE (2018-08-27). "Watch your mouth! Profanity could cost you in Myrtle Beach". WLOS. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
- "A beach in South Carolina made over $22,000 by charging people for swearing". The Independent. 2018-08-30. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
- Montagu, Ashley (2001). The Anatomy of Swearing. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 298. ISBN 0-8122-1764-0.
- "Minced oath". The Phrase Finder.
- Stephens, R., Atkins, J., & Kingston, A. (2009). Swearing as a response to pain. Neuroreport, 20(12), 1056-1060.
- Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2012). The science of swearing. APS Observer, 25(5). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-science-of-swearing accessed 1 January 2020
- Savage, S. D. (2016). What not to swear: how do children learn bad words? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama Libraries)
- Suganob-Nicolau, M. F. (2016). Swear words among young learners: A case study of the elementary students. Indonesian JELT, 11(2), 117-132.
- Feldman, G., Lian, H., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2017). Frankly, we do give a damn: The relationship between profanity and honesty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 816-826.
- de Vries, R. E., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Dunlop, P. D., Holtrop, D., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Honest people tend to use less—not more—profanity: Comment on Feldman et al.’s (2017) Study 1. Social psychological and personality science, 9(5), 516-520.
- "Art or trash? It makes for endless, unwinnable debate". The Topeka Capital-Journal. 1997-10-06. Archived from the original on 2003-09-20. Retrieved 2007-12-20.
Another perennial target, J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye, was challenged in Maine because of the "f" word.
- MacIntyre, Ben (2005-09-24). "The American banned list reveals a society with serious hang-ups". The Times. London. Retrieved 2007-12-20.
- "Raw Dialog Challenges all the Censors". Life Magazine: 92. 10 June 1966.
- "100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990–1999". American Library Association. 2013-03-27. Retrieved 15 June 2014.
- "Todd v. Rochester Community Schools, 200 NW 2d 90 - Mich: Court of Appeals 1972". Archived from the original on 2019-03-25.
- December 5, FIRE; 1962 (1962-12-05). "Comedian Lenny Bruce Arrested for Obscenity and Is Convicted". FIRE. Retrieved 2020-10-19.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
- BBFC Case Studies – Sweet Sixteen. bbfc.co.uk
- Brandon Sanderson (2008-05-03). "Annotation Mistborn 2 Chapter Thirty-Two".
- Almond, Ian (2003). "Derrida and the Secret of the Non-Secret: On Respiritualising the Profane". Literature and Theology. 17 (4): 457–471. doi:10.1093/litthe/17.4.457.
- Bryson, Bill (1990) The Mother Tongue
- Bulcke, Camille (2001) . An English-Hindi Dictionary (3rd ed.). Ramnagar, New Delhi: Chand. ISBN 81-219-0559-1.
- Croom, Adam M. (2011). "Slurs". Language Sciences. 33 (3): 343–358. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2010.11.005.
- Hughes, Geoffrey (2004) . Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. Penguin UK. ISBN 9780141954325.
- Johnson, Sterling (2004) Watch Your F*cking Language
- McEnery, Tony (2006) Swearing in English: bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present, Routledge ISBN 0-415-25837-5.
- O'Connor, Jim (2000) Cuss Control
- Sagarin Edward (1962) The Anatomy of Dirty Words
- Sheidlower, Jesse (2009) The F-Word (3rd ed.)
- Spears, Richard A. (1990) Forbidden American English
- Stollznow, Karen. "Swearing is bad?". Archived from the original on 2007-05-21.
- Wajnryb, Ruth (2005) Expletive Deleted: A Good Look at Bad Language
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Profanity.|
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Profanity|
|Look up profanity in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
- Most vulgar words in The Online Slang Dictionary (as voted by visitors)
- Francis Grose (1811). Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue at Project Gutenberg