TOSCO II process
|Industrial sector(s)||Chemical industry
|Main facilities||Colony Shale Oil Project|
The TOSCO II process is an above ground retorting technology for shale oil extraction, which uses fine particles of oil shale that are heated in a rotating kiln. The particularity of this process is that it use hot ceramic balls for the heat transfer between the retort and a heater. The process was tested in a 40 tonnes per hour test facility near Parachute, Colorado.
TOSCO II process is a refinement of the Swedish Aspeco process. The Tosco Corporation purchased its patent rights in 1952. In 1956, the Denver Research Institute performed research and development of this technology, including testing of a 24 ton per day pilot plant, which operated until 1966. Later the technology development was continued under Tosco's own directions. In 1964 Tosco, Standard Oil of Ohio, and Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company formed Colony Development, a joint venture company to develop the Colony Shale Oil Project and to commercialize the TOSCO II technology. The project was ended in April 1972.
The TOSCO II process is classified as a hot recycled solids technology. It employs a horizontal rotating kiln-type retort. In this process, oil shale is crushed smaller than 0.5 inches (13 mm) and enters the system through pneumatic lift pipes in which oil shale is elevated by hot gas streams and preheated to about 500 °F (260 °C). After entering into retort, oil shale is mixed with hot ceramic balls with temperature from 1,200 °F (650 °C) to 1,600 °F (870 °C). This increase the oil shale temperature to between 900 °F (480 °C) and 1,100 °F (590 °C), in which pyrolysis occurs. In the pyrolysis process, kerogen decomposes to oil shale gas and oil vapors, while the remainder of the oil shale forms spent shale. Vapors are transferred to a condensor (fractionator) for separation into various fractions. At the kiln passage, the spent shale and the ceramic balls are separated in a perforated rotating separation drum (trommel). The crushed spent shale falls through holes in the trommel, while ceramic balls are transferred to the ball heater. Combustible shale gas is burned in the ball heater to reheat the ceramic balls.
The overall thermal efficiency of TOSCO II process is low because the energy of spent shale is not recovered and much of the produced shale gas is consumed by the process itself. The efficiency could be increased by burning char (carbonaceous residue in the spent shale) instead of shale gas as a fuel of the ball heater. The process' other disadvantages are mechanical complexity and large number of moving parts. Also the lifetime of ceramic balls is limited. Disposal of spent shale includes environmental problems because it is very finely crushed and contains carbon residue.
- Alberta Taciuk Process
- Kiviter process
- Petrosix process
- Galoter process
- Fushun process
- Paraho process
- Lurgi-Ruhrgas process
- "The Trillion-Barrel Field". Time. 1957-06-03. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- United States Office of Technology Assessment (June 1980). An Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies (PDF). DIANE Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4289-2463-5. NTIS order #PB80-210115. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Yen, Teh Fu; Chilingar, George V. (1976). Oil Shale. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 244. ISBN 978-0-444-41408-3. Retrieved 2009-07-07.
- Burnham, Alan K.; McConaghy, James R. (2006-10-16). Comparison of the acceptability of various oil shale processes (PDF). 26th Oil shale symposium. Golden, Colorado: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. UCRL-CONF-226717. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Johnson, Harry R.; Crawford, Peter M.; Bunger, James W. (2004). "Strategic significance of America's oil shale resource. Volume II: Oil shale resources, technology and economics" (PDF). Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Petroleum Reserves; Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves; United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Lee, Sunggyu (1990). Oil Shale Technology. CRC Press. p. 111. ISBN 0-8493-4615-0. Retrieved 2008-11-29.