Talk:Darth Vader: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Signing comment by 86.165.9.28 - "Starred Article?: new section")
Line 56: Line 56:
   
 
Do they both need FULL bios for him? The Anakin article covers straight through. The Vader article covers the OT then doubles back to the PT. If we're to have two articles, there really shouldn't be so much double coverage. And considering that aside from the introduction, the Anakin article is nothing BUT said bio, I fail to see the overwhelming need for two. I know "its been discussed to death" but I just want a logical answer to that question. If we remove all content from the Anakin article that is covered on the Vader article, we are left with enough information to, say, put on a character list. If we keep two articles, I STRONGLY feel we should treat them as two seperate entities. Cover the Jedi Anakin's info on that page and the Sith Lord Vader's info here.
 
Do they both need FULL bios for him? The Anakin article covers straight through. The Vader article covers the OT then doubles back to the PT. If we're to have two articles, there really shouldn't be so much double coverage. And considering that aside from the introduction, the Anakin article is nothing BUT said bio, I fail to see the overwhelming need for two. I know "its been discussed to death" but I just want a logical answer to that question. If we remove all content from the Anakin article that is covered on the Vader article, we are left with enough information to, say, put on a character list. If we keep two articles, I STRONGLY feel we should treat them as two seperate entities. Cover the Jedi Anakin's info on that page and the Sith Lord Vader's info here.
  +
merge it or die
   
 
== Height ==
 
== Height ==

Revision as of 14:58, 17 December 2008

Former good article Darth Vader was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 26, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
April 10, 2006 Peer review Reviewed
July 21, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted
May 2, 2008 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:FAOL


Archives

Two articles question

Do they both need FULL bios for him? The Anakin article covers straight through. The Vader article covers the OT then doubles back to the PT. If we're to have two articles, there really shouldn't be so much double coverage. And considering that aside from the introduction, the Anakin article is nothing BUT said bio, I fail to see the overwhelming need for two. I know "its been discussed to death" but I just want a logical answer to that question. If we remove all content from the Anakin article that is covered on the Vader article, we are left with enough information to, say, put on a character list. If we keep two articles, I STRONGLY feel we should treat them as two seperate entities. Cover the Jedi Anakin's info on that page and the Sith Lord Vader's info here. merge it or die

Height

Can someone fix the height.? It says 1.35 meters but thats was when he was a child (1.35 meters is a little over 3 and a half feet)

Death Star

There is this line in the article:
"Aboard the second Death Star, which is being constructed in orbit"
Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to recall that it was the original Death Star, being repaired.
There is a scene shot, as it is approached, of a half blown-up Death Star, not a new one constructed from scratch.
Hence the comment: "yes, it is fully operational"... GW-Dragonrider (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
It's a new one. Thedarxide (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Is "partially human cyborg" a species?

The "Species" section of the infobox seems to be more complicated than necessary. Surely his species is simply human. The cybernetic modifications have no bearing on this. If nobody objects then I will change it. 86.7.31.118 (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Change it, he's human. Thedarxide (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Done. Labalius (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Vader as Anakin's enemy

Can Vader be considered as Anakin's archenemy? Because the prequel trilogy follows Anakin's struggle with his dark side, which can be portayed by Vader. What do you say? Leader Vladimir

Starred Article?

I propose this page become a starred article. Discuss? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.9.28 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)