The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Speedily closed as out of process. I had moved the genetics article back to Selection immediately after it was moved, because there was no discussion about moving that page in the first place. As the title is currently occupied, and there has been no specific discussion about whether it is the primary topic of the term, and particularly whether any of the other senses challenge the genetic sense for long-term importance, this proposal is out of process; a multi-move request should be initiated at the current Talk:Selection to move both the genetic sense and the disambiguation page. bd2412T 13:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Support as per all y'all Red Slash 19:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Please fix the incoming links to Selection first. Cheers! bd2412T 17:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Selection (biology) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Should there be an article on selection in general ?
The idea of selection has been handled in various specific areas, but does there need to be an article on the subject of selection in general? It would float above the other topics. For example what computational aspects are found in biological selection, or how human mating selection relates to biological selection and affects social selection. -ApexUnderground (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)