Talk:Šumarice Memorial Park

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Šumarice Memorial Park article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Military history: Memorials / Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sumarice kg.jpg[edit]

Image:Sumarice kg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sumarice kg.jpg[edit]

Image:Sumarice kg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

massacre over people and innocent children- Sumarice[edit]

39 pupils of the V/3 class of Kragujevac Gymnasium, along with professor have been killed. A German soldier, Josef Sulc, refused to shoot on children and was killed too. Info, not forget human, brave soldier. Old data is 2536 victims and new 2976, hard to say which one is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.180.29.195 (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

I contend that the name of this article should be "October in Kragujevac Memorial Park" which is the name of the park in English, as shown by the website of the park. Per WP:NAMECHANGES, we give extra weight to sources written after the name change is announced. Whilst not as concise as Šumarice Memorial Park, it is much more clearly recognisable as associated with the Kragujevac massacre, with recognisability being a characteristic used to determine WP:TITLE. Šumarice is essentially the locality in which the park is situated, and is unrecognisable as being related to the massacre. Most readers would expect to find the word Kragujevac in the title of an article about the park that commemorates the Kragujevac massacre. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, whatever, just please use WP:RQM template. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 01:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, you accept my argument but think it should be done as a RM? That's a bit weird, but OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 January 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. At this point there are insufficient references in the article to support either name, and there is no consensus for this proposal. Suggest gathering third-party references to help determine the WP:COMMONNAME. (closed by non-admin page mover) Brad v 17:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Šumarice Memorial Park → October in Kragujevac Memorial Park – is the current name of the park in English, as shown by the website of the park. Per WP:NAMECHANGES, we give extra weight to sources written after the name change is announced. Whilst not as concise as Šumarice Memorial Park, it is much more clearly recognisable as associated with the Kragujevac massacre, with recognisability being a characteristic used to determine WP:TITLE. Šumarice is essentially the locality in which the park is situated, and is unrecognisable as being related to the massacre. Most readers would expect to find the word Kragujevac in the title of an article about the park that commemorates the Kragujevac massacre. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. -- Dane ^talk 09:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Peacemaker67: would Kragujevac October Memorial Park as DK Eyewitness Guide be acceptable? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, In ictu oculi. I don't think it is necessary for it to be a pro forma translation, and that would be more concise. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as i think syntax is not the best as In ictu oculi already noted. Also, Šumarice is quite COMMONNAME while proposed one is used only on website and thats it. When you search google, you have 6 results for new one. Proposition is not good, we should find a better proposition, or leave it as it is for years. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per guidelines. Google Books support a name change. Also their website does the same thing. Or if a better name is proposed it is worthy to be discussed. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.