This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I don't know why, but this strikes me as extremely funny. "2. Make arrangements with your local police or sheriff's office to relinquish your .50 BMG Rifle. CALL FIRST. DO NOT GO TO THE POLICE OR SHERIFF'S OFFICE WITHOUT FIRST MAKING ARRANGEMENTS." V. Joe 02:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
To make it clear, these weapons range from twenty to fourty pounds, start at four and a half feet long, and fire bullets that can cost more than a dollar a pop. They're really, really not a good option for criminal behavior. The VPC did come up with some criminal ownership or crimes committed involving .50 caliber rifles, http://www.vpc.org/snipercrime.htm , but the results are both under contention (most cases involved illegal ownership rather than use of the rifle in a violent crime, the Branch Davidian use of .50 caliber weapons is highly controversial as stated on the Waco Siege page) and fairly minimal given the range of time they cover. I'm unaware of any long-term statistics. ---- Gattsuru
I think this they refer to only California where there has not been a single case of someone using the .50 bmg to attack someone --Daniel107 (talk) 20:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
There is a recorded use of a .50BMG during a crime. There was some kind of .50BMG rifle mounted to the top of Marvin Heemeyer's "Killdozer" which was fired several times during his rampage. It should be noted, however, that his entire rampage failed to injure anybody, excluding Heemeyer's own suicide. So it was used, but nobody was injured or killed by it. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
The edit stating that the BMG law is "completely unconstitutional after D.C. v. Heller" is inane. Heller determined the law in federal jurisdiction as regards to a handgun law. It had nothing to do with individual state laws, as the Second Amendment has still not been incorporated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Banning any type of gun is inane because a criminal would ignore the law anyway.22.214.171.124 (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
You've been overtaken by events, asshole. Second Amendment has been incorporated.