Talk:11th Army (Wehrmacht)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

11th SS Panzer Army[edit]

From Talk:11th SS Panzer Army#Dates

Actually Tessin gives this Army as Wehrmacht. He explains that it was formed by the Waffen-SS but lists the official name as 11. Armee (AOK 11) and that it was also known as SS panzer-Armeeoberkommando 11. For comparison he lists the 6th SS Panzer Army as 6. (SS) Panzer Armee (Pz. AOK 6). Note that the errata to volume 3 gives November 26 1944 as formation date (obvious compared to the November 26 1945 in the original edition), not sure why the article currently lists February 1945. Assuming Tessin is correct with the name this should indeed be merged with the other 11th Army article.--Caranorn 19:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

But this article says that the commander from October 1944 to March 1945 was General der Artillerie Anton Graßer, and if that is true then Obergruppenführer Felix Steiner could not be commander from November 1944 to February 1945. I think this needs some more research. --PBS (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Error[edit]

There were two 11th Armies -the 11th Army Wehrmacht and the 11th SS Panzer Army created in 1945. Why was the info on the 11th Army Wehrmacht deleted? This is a mess, a royal screwup.--Woogie10w (talk) 10:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

yes,I think the producer mix two 11th army 海因茨冯曼施坦因 (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Not an error[edit]

Why the other chart except “1945” cannot be illustrated? 海因茨冯曼施坦因 (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia requires reliable sources; please have a look at WP:RS and WP:MILMOS#SOURCES. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
No,I think it's some error about programming,not the sources 海因茨冯曼施坦因 (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
the another section was written by the editor,but it cannot be displayed by the problem of programming 海因茨冯曼施坦因 (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
No, that's not an error in programming. It was commented out due to having no sources. Please do not change the article if you are unable to add sources. I will revert to the prior version. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)