Talk:1920 New South Wales state election

Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1920 New South Wales state election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

How many votes did each elector have?[edit]

Dunno if anyone's watching this page, but I'm wondering about the results. At the moment we seem to be assuming that each elector cast three (country) or five (metro) votes, and calculating the turnout / results based on that, i.e. dividing the total number of votes in each seat by three or five. I'm not sure this is correct - it produces quite strange figures for turnout and informal voting ... surely turnout couldn't have dropped by 40% and informal voting increased by 27%! I think it's more likely that each elector cast one vote, so the total number of voters should match the number of electors. (I don't quite have the terminology to describe what this is called, but I think it's more akin to the current Tasmanian system rather than the 1901+ Senate system). This is what this source uses. Can anyone shed any light on this? Otherwise I can probably take a look at some of the book sources at some point. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivar the Boneful: 3 years later & the only difference between us is that I'm sure this is not correct - there is an error in the New South Wales Election Results database: Antony Green is good, not god. The district page [1] has every district around 50-60% turnout, but the totals page [2] gives a turnout of 19%. The same error infects the informal votes & party totals. The party % are just a little out. I don't trust the UWA site as it has had too many errors to be considered reliable. I have gone back to the district results & added up the party votes to get the accurate totals. Same issue in 1922 & 1925 so will sort those out next. Any editor is free to correct any mistakes I may have made or discuss them here if unsure. Oh and the phrase you were looking for is single transferable vote. --Find bruce (talk) 12:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]