Talk:1RXS J160929.1−210524

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon 1RXS J160929.1−210524 is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
 

sun-like[edit]

Apparently this is not necessarily the first imaged. See [1] Also why doesn't the article mention failed binary system and captured proto-star as possible formation avenues? 75.41.110.200 (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

On the subject of the position of the planet and the position at which it formed, the two could be different because of a planet being traded by passing stars. The relative velocity of passing stars can be near the escape velocity as is that of Proxima Centauri relative to A & B. Such a trading of planets would be a rare event, but considering the number of possible rare events that could conceivably be seen, the surprising occurrence would be a failure to see any rare events. I do not know where to find references for any of this. --Fartherred (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Size?[edit]

I remember reading that any planet from the mass of Jupiter all the way up to a brown dwarf star should be about the same size as Jupiter. Is this true here, at least as much as the luminosity can tell us? Wnt (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1RXS J160929.1−210524. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)