Talk:1RXS J160929.1−210524

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon 1RXS J160929.1−210524 is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.


Apparently this is not necessarily the first imaged. See [1] Also why doesn't the article mention failed binary system and captured proto-star as possible formation avenues? (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

On the subject of the position of the planet and the position at which it formed, the two could be different because of a planet being traded by passing stars. The relative velocity of passing stars can be near the escape velocity as is that of Proxima Centauri relative to A & B. Such a trading of planets would be a rare event, but considering the number of possible rare events that could conceivably be seen, the surprising occurrence would be a failure to see any rare events. I do not know where to find references for any of this. --Fartherred (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


I remember reading that any planet from the mass of Jupiter all the way up to a brown dwarf star should be about the same size as Jupiter. Is this true here, at least as much as the luminosity can tell us? Wnt (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1RXS J160929.1−210524. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)