Talk:1st Combat Engineer Regiment (Australia)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history (Rated C-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Australia / Military history (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon 1st Combat Engineer Regiment (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (marked as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to for other than editorial assistance.


Please, anyone who can help with this article should leave a message on the disscussion page under this section BEFORE EDITING.--DJackD (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that editors are not able to impose conditions on which other editors contribute to articles and, broadly speaking, what they contribute as long as it is consistent with Wikipedia's five pillars which govern editing. Please also see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Nick-D (talk) 01:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, good work starting this article. I have made a couple of edits, though. Firstly, it is not correct to say 'Royal Australian Army'. The Army does not use the Royal prefix, most of its component Corps do (although some do not, e.g. Aviation). Secondly, the information about the RAE itself should be included in the Royal Australian Engineers article. The way it was previously written was a bit confusing, making it sound as if 1 CER was a Corps, which it is not. — AustralianRupert (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks I hoped someone would like it. And thanks for the update, I didn't know that. Feel free to keep it running if you want, I'll be editing too of course.--DJackD (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)