Talk:2006 Lebanon War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article 2006 Lebanon War was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on 2006 Lebanon War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 Lebanon War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Please escape the asterisk in the battlebox's footnote[edit]

As I'm not allowed to edit the article, I propose a small fix: When I look at the Infobox military conflict, the first footnote in the "| notes=" section of the box is marked with a bullet point instead of a single asterisk. This could be avoided by using the HTML escape sequence for the asterisk (&#42;), so that consequently the Wikipedia software does not automatically transform the asterisk into a bullet point.--Micge (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Done, thanks to Morphdog and Kingsindian. --Micge (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 March 2017[edit]

In the source code of the article, in the Infobox Military Conflict, please change

 | notes=
*It was widely reported that

to

 | notes=
&#42;It was widely reported that

because the * is changed to a bullet point by the wiki syntax as it starts a new line, while it is clearly meant to be an asterisk for a footnote. The Idea of starting a new line behind notes= is nonetheless good, as there are several notes. The second note, marked with **, follows later, clearly separated by an empty line. So some separation is helpful for recognizing this structure. Micge (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Morphdog (t - c) 16:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick reaction. However, there is an extra leading * now, that should not be there as per my request. So I made a new request to fix this small typo as this * transforms to a bullet point. --Micge (talk) 14:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 March 2017[edit]

In the code of the article in the infobox military conflict, please change

 | notes=
*&#42;It was widely reported that

to

 | notes=
&#42;It was widely reported that

because the leading non-escaped asterisk is transformed to a bullet point. There should be exactly one asterisk, and it should be escaped. The * is just a small typo made when implementing the edit request above, anyway. Micge (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks, Micge. Kingsindian   14:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)