Talk:2007 Washington Nationals season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / District of Columbia (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.
 
WikiProject Baseball (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Reverting changes[edit]

I undid the removal of the wild card standings. No reason was given for the removal. Fbdave 03:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, here's the reason. Yes, I am aware that the template passed TfD. However, although the template hasn't been deleted, it still serves no purpose in the article. Here we are a month into the season and the Wildcard standings aren't relevant now. Why include them? It takes up too much space to include something that has no relevance or importance in May. In September, it will grow more important, but right now this template doesn't do any good by being included in the article and therefore should be removed from the articles until the template becomes more relevant.
Is there truly any reason to keep this as of right now? --Ksy92003 03:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Both MLB.com and foxsports.com list wild card standings. Fbdave 04:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
And? They're official websites. They have to have those standings. It doesn't take up any space because it's an option that somebody can select to view. On Wikipedia, it isn't an option. If we are gonna have it on the article, then we have to put it there and take up loads of space. You can either see it or you don't. You can't decide for yourself if you want to see it or not if you go to the article. You get my point?
Besides the fact that you saw it on two other sites, do you have any reasons why the wild card standings should be included? --Ksy92003 05:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps we need to include them as {{2007 NL Wild Card standings}} so that someone can choose to view it.Fbdave 13:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Or shall we have a vote to decide if the Wild Card standings should be included? Hornberry 15:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Disabled list[edit]

I have started italicizing players on the disabled list in the statistics. I feel that this is important information. Fbdave 22:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)