Talk:2008 Yemen cyclone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article 2008 Yemen cyclone has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star 2008 Yemen cyclone is part of the Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 9, 2016 Good article nominee Listed
May 15, 2017 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Tropical cyclones / Storms  (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the storm articles task force (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Meteorology / Flood  (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meteorology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meteorology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article relates to flooding.
 

Thank you[edit]

Whoever made this page, I'd like to thank. This page has had quite innapropriate content earlier but now it's a detailed describer of the event.

User:K50 Dude

Citations[edit]

As I see it everything is from 1 of 2 sources. Which is fine if it covers enough, but instead of leaving sources as uncited one can use the "ref name" tag and cite the same source so as to cover the whole article and not to have uncited info. Then of course the citations missing would be fair game for removal. Lihaas (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I was wondering if there was a way to cite whole sections... Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Fixed citation stuff. SpencerT♦C 01:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Possible Link?[edit]

Is it possible this flooding was from the Tropical Depression that made landfall earlier this week? If so, then it could be included in that article. (Hurricaneguy (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC))

Renaming[edit]

Please do not move an article unless you are given the go ahead for it. I already have a separate article for the cyclone under-construction. They can stay separate so long as there is enough information to keep the flood article stable. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Mitch caused heavy deaths due to its flooding.this tropical storm caused the flooding not its remnants.if mitch can have a title page then this storm is worth having one, not something as yemen floods praddy06 (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

As I said, I'm making the article now, the flood article isn't going to be the "title page". I just need at least an hour or two to finish it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
i did not see that.its good u started an article once its finished it can be merged with the main article praddy06 (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Well. Actually the storm wasn't notable at all while the floods are. I think it should be kept as a flood article. --213.155.231.26 (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I think the Storm was notable enough to warrant an article with the floods being merged into the impact section Jason Rees (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
No. According to the RSMC, it issued the last warning to the system on 23-10-2008 while SUSTAINED MAXIMUM WIND SPEED IS ESTIMATED TO BE ABOUT 15-20 KNOTS. Maybe the floods are caused by the remnants of the system, but the system isn't notable for writing an article itself. --Matthiasb (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Map[edit]

Maybe the map could/should be replaced with Image:2008 Yemen rainfall totals 03B.jpg? --Matthiasb (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Track[edit]

Probably the track map of this need to be in the meteorological section. Hurricane Typhoon Cyclone 23:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

It will be placed in their as soon as somone gets around to writing the article.Jason Rees (talk) 23:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2008 Yemen cyclone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria[edit]

(a) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
(b) all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
(c) it contains no original research
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After (finally) reading the article over, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!!! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Hope you liked it. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)