Talk:2009 in LGBT rights

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Human rights (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject LGBT studies (Rated List-class)
WikiProject icon This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.


Resolved: Relevent information added to 2008 and 2009 articles. Thanks, Outsider80 (talk) 02:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

On December 15, 2008 the Hungarian Supreme Court struck the Registered Partnership Bill as unconstitutional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


When does the SSM law become affective?


So what is the latest in hungary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 in LGBT rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY Archived sources have been checked N but failed to be useful/working

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)