Talk:2010 Copiapó mining accident

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2010 Copiapó mining accident was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowIn the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that around 2,000 members of the media from around the world traveled to the site of the rescue of the Chilean miners?
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 13, 2010, and August 23, 2010.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 13, 2011.


Error in Plan B[edit]

The "boreholes that were already keeping the miners supplied with palomas" doesn't seem correct. "[palomas]" is an alcoholic drink. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paloma_(cocktail) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read the section "Videos sent to the surface". Britmax (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discursive and overdetailed[edit]

I think all the right material is here, but it's way overdetailed e.g. we don't need to know the color of the coveralls the men wore on the way up. EEng

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2010 Copiapó mining accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on 2010 Copiapó mining accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article additions[edit]

Should be in article "over 90 percent of Americans born in the 2010s never heard about this story (and never will)". Also, most Americans alive in 2010 probably ignored this story or didn't follow it (if they didn't follow the news). It's obvious that in many countires this story was less covered than in the US. I believe that the media coverage over this tragedy was one of the lowest points in journalistic history. If Peter Jennings was alive in 2010, I know for a fact he would have ignored this story since he knew it was media sensalist trash.Randomnewsarticlecommentor (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]