Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
April 19, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 01:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well written:
1a. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead is not written in summary style. It has references that do not appear elsewhere in the article. The lead needs to summarise the article. Please move unique information into the body, remove citations from lead, and have lead summarise the article. The list incorporation needs work.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2c. it contains no original research. The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
6a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Problems fixed. :) --LauraHale (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Comment: I reviewed this article on the DYK level and checked about 2/3rds of these things at the time. Hence review brevity. --LauraHale (talk) 01:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)