Important notice: The topic of this article may be the subject of sub judice concerns in the United Kingdom due to ongoing criminal trial. All editors should exercise caution in editing or commenting on the topic of this article. Editors in the UK jurisdictions may also wish to consider any personal legal implications. Please remember that legal information provided on Wikipedia cannot substitute for the advice of a licensed professional.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"one elderly male, Arnold Lancaster, 71, and a female - Tracey Arden, 44 - died as a result of the contamination, though it was also reported that each of the patients also had underlying medical conditions that made them weaker. On 21 July 2011, it was confirmed that two more patients had died, bringing the death count to five" Who was the fifth? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owain meurig (talk • contribs) 17:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that as well, and have fixed it per the cited source. The missing person was George Keep, aged 84. Graham87 06:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
The page is currently a bit of a mess, with dated events appearing out of sequence, and I think in particular the shift of suspicion from Leighton to Chua is not sufficiently deliniated. We also seem to have a massive omission in the form of the jutsification for Leighton's dismissal, especially in light of Chua's conviction. I'll see if I can make this a bit more coherent. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC)