This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"Rapid Fire: 2011-03-22". Defense Industry Daily. 2011-03-22. Retrieved 2011-03-30. One of the best places for an overview of the allied operations in Libya can actually be found on Wikipedia. Hail to the swarm. (details)
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 2 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Its needed in the battlebox a streght ondicator of teh opossing force...at lest indicating how many US ships have taken part or how many planes gadhafi poses over libya , etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2011
Italian commander was not Silvio Berlusconi, but Giorgio Napolitano (President of the Republic). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 14:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
true! you're correct. noclador (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The most important part is not in the article at all
This article should explain the scope of the No-Flyzone that was agreed and its subsequent violation in where loyalist military vehicles were attacked, even inside civilian cities. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 08:03, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
A few years have passed since these events took place and there is more information lying about now that "the dust has settled". What I'm proposing is to update the article with a bit of reorganising, adding clarity, new reviews, etc. I would contribute myself and welcome others to do so also. Any comments? ArticunoWebon (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
If only it was as easy to Cleanup, and undo, the total mess left by this military intervention? That said, fully updating the article - to take account of the bloody chaos and terrorism since the start of the conflict - would be most telling. War on Terror or War-of-Terror?
There is a section entitled "Military losses on the coalition side" but none "Military losses on the Libyan side". As the intervention was largely targeting the Libyan military this seems an odd omission. Are there any figures available? Even if there are not a section stating why would strengthen the article. The Libyan military was about 50% conscript I believe so this is also relevant for totally impact on the population and wider society. RogerHyam (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)