Finally, if you are certain that the event is important, you can proceed to making your edit.
2012 was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.
It's time for this article to be unprotected[edit]
2012 has already come and gone. It's 2015 now, and this page is still protected. The end of the world hype that surrounded 2012 is gone now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archanine (talk • contribs) 17:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2015[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Amortias (T)(C) 10:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Also, the event does not have much international significance, so it would be a better fit for 2012 in the United Kingdom. — YerpoEh? 10:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Amortias (T)(C) 10:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please provide 
