Talk:2012 Super Rugby season

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wins/Losses in-a-row stat[edit]

May I suggest including an additional statistic to the "Standings" tables. On the NHL website they always list the current "streak" a team is on. For example if a team has won their last 3 games in the "Streak" column they would have "WON 3" or if they have lost their last game only they would have "LOST 1". I find this stat very interesting and, indeed, newspapers often cite this stat but it is lacking from this page. I would do it myself but it seems this page receives many edits from many people and I wouldn't want to step on anyone's toes here. Angusprain (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking of showing a team's progression throughout the season. Their current streak can easily be read from that (plus you can see a term's streak during any point of the season). Something like the table below. Any suggestions or recommendations? TheMightyPeanut (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good to me and a useful addition to the page. Jowaninpensans (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unanimous then, moved to the main page! TheMightyPeanut (talk) 20:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, looks good! Angusprain (talk) 10:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sponsored names[edit]

Throughout this document - and several others - the sponsored names for stadia are used, yet not the sponsored names for teams (i.e. Vodacom Bulls, HSBC Waratahs). Should this be done for consistency? TheMightyPeanut (talk) 10:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say no. The sponsored names are additions to the team names. There are e.g. no other Waratahs than the ones sponsored by HSBC, so that adds no information. But the stadium names become meaningless without the sponsor names. To be meaningful, the stadium names would have to be replaced by the non-sponsored names (e.g. Lancaster Park, Stadium Australia, Melbourne Rectangular Stadium) but IMO those are less known and would add more confusion. /Coffeeshivers (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]