Talk:2013 MLS Cup Playoffs

Time

Last year's article used 24-hour time and each game was reported in local time. I see that we have had some editing between 24- and 12-hour time, but that the time is Eastern. Also, since time change is happening on Nov. 3, it's not DST after that date, so it's just as easy to indicate local times. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I see that someone has done it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Score format

The score format uses an unspaced en-dash: 2–1. If there's any question, please see an established article such as 2010 FIFA World Cup#Group A. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

The finals are incorrect

The teams listed in the final are wrong. First both eastern teams are listed in different legs of the match. That's confusing. Second, we never list both possible western teams. It obvious that the semi-finals, or east/west finals are going to meet in the finals. There is no need to have this, even if has been done before. Linking country has been done before but it's against WP:OVERLINK. Adding country and state flags has been done before and that's against WP:MOSFLAG. I don't know if this is against a guideline, but it's just plain wrong. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Both Eastern teams are in different legs because the team with the better regular season record hosts the cup. SKC has the best record overall, and Houston the worst. Therefore, it is necessary to put the teams in the finals, since it isn't obvious who hosts who. The format is how it has been put on other leagues' pages and how it has been done for past MLS Cup Playoffs.Elisfkc (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

So what? It's not necessary to put any teams in the finals. In fact it's no more necessary to put them in the finals than it was to put teams in the eastern and western finals when we knew who the four potential teams were. Again, if that's how it's been done in the past, and it wasn't done that way last year, it was wrong and you should stop doing it wrong. What other leagues? Not the NHL, in fact it is actively discouraged there. No other association football pages allow this in ladders. I don't follow other playoffs so I can't comment.

I have tagged your talk page for edit warring. You are presently at 3RR and should not step over the line. I will not make the change, but I trust someone will. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:46, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

It has been listed like this in other American Soccer leagues such as the USL Pro & NWSL. And does it really matter that much? It will be changed within a month to the two teams in the final. Elisfkc (talk) 20:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it matters. It's duplication of information. It's saying "we don't know the teams, but this is how it could play-out". Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

That means that the article gives more information to the reader, which is the point of Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

More useless information. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 MLS Cup Playoffs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121031140259/http://www.mlssoccer.com/mlscup/2012 to http://www.mlssoccer.com/mlscup/2012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)