Talk:2017 Nepalese provincial elections

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Source for PR seats[edit]

What is the source for the PR seats? They don't fully align with the numbers published in the English language Nepali press and have been inserted before the official seat allocation was published on the 22nd.--Batmacumba (talk) 14:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Kathmandu Post and Himalaya Times have this distribution.--Batmacumba (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CPN-UML 75
Nepali Congress 72
Maoist Centre 35
Sanghiya Samajwadi Forum (SSF) 13
Rastriya Janata Party (RJP) 12
Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP) 3
Bibeksheel Sajha Party (BSP) 3
Rastriya Janamorcha (RJM) 2
Naya Shakti Party (NSP) 1
Rastriya Prajatantra Party-Democratic (RPP-D) 1
Nepal Workers and Peasants Party 1
Nepal Sanghiya Samajbadi Party (NSSP) 1
Sanghiya Loktantrik Rastriya Manch (SLRM) 1

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/uml-secures-74-seats-followed-ncs-72-seats-provincial-assembly/

Notice[edit]

This article was created a bit hastily to safe a results table that a user had clearly spent a lot of time creating, and some moron just deleted from the legislative elections article because it "didn't fit in", rather than moving it to a separate article, or saving it on an election project page. Please do not delete it if you think its too shallow (or if you do, at least safe the damn table somewhere...), its better to improve it.--Batmacumba (talk) 11:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Batmacumba: The table was not deleted from the legislative election article (it is still here if you had bothered looking). The only haste here has been yours in making unfounded accusations and violating WP:NPA. Number 5 7 11:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have made no personal attack, just criticized you. Not the same thing.--Batmacumba (talk) 12:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Batmacumba: Are you seriously claiming that calling someone a moron is not a personal attack? And are you going to admit to being wrong about the supposed deletion of the table? Number 5 7 12:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]