Talk:2 1/2-dimensional manufacturing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polymers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Merge[edit]

Merge/redirect this page into 2.5D? czar ♔ 12:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 July 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 04:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2 1/2D → 2 1/2-dimensional manufacturing – I considered AfD, but this term seems to be in use for molding and extrusion processes. However, the title needs to clearly disambiguate from the unrelated 2.5D, which concerns video game graphics. Not sure how the fraction in the title should be represented per MOS:FRAC. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. The suggested styling of the fraction looks fine; we should not use the Unicode fraction glyph. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.