Talk:3D printing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Technology (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 3D printing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Safety advice[edit]

Removing this to talk here because its written like advice per WP:NOTADVICE. Needs to be rewritten. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

As I posted on my talk page I agree that we should not be writing "advice," though I still think there is a place for documenting known safety hazards. Thoughts on how to best present such information would be helpful. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 21:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It looks like Doc James has made useful adjustments. I think that should cover the concerns? James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Actually Doc James really didn't address the problem so I rewrote it[1]. This is stuff that belongs more at your talk page but I will address it here. Many editors have complained about your editing tactics, you seem to be using Wikipedia as a newspaper publishing your organizations findings (see WP:NOTNEWSPAPER). This sets up a WP:COI .... explained again on your talk page. I would suggest not citing "your" organization in what sounds like a press release, you should instead cite some independent 3rd party source that has referenced your findings. Lack of 3rd party sourcing may be a reason to delete the whole section (I have not addressed that). Familiarizing yourself with what I did clean up, WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:YESPOV (clearly indicating "who said that") and WP:TONE (second person is inappropriately associated with step-by-step instructions of a how-to guide), would go a long way to fixing the problem. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Stating recommendations from a well respected medical organization is different than stating how to advice is Wikipedia's voice.
Positions of major health care organizations are deemed to be suitable sources per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:MOSMED/Writing style recommends against addressing the reader directly or giving "how-to" instructions.
WP:MEDRS recommends literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources. "suitable" is a sliding scale at that guideline and a single source COI related entry below the level of a "National Guideline" is noted to be problematic. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

1998 Adam Opel GmbH imaging and simulation software[edit]

Appearantly, there's a imaging and simulation software developed by Adam Opel GmbH and Professor Lothar Harzheim (in 1998) that is able to create a design that allows optimum strength, using a minimum of materials. It does this by calculating out the amounts of stress on different points in the design, and then adjusting the design based on this. It yields a very efficient design, and benefits from the merits of additive manufacturing (3D printing).


I think the software is called "TopShape" (see , Can someone make a wikipedia page on it, and link it from the 3D printing page ?

KVDP (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

in srilanka[edit]

only few place available — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)