Talk:3Delight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Software / Computing  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Animation / American (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American animation work group (marked as Low-importance).
 

Where's the beef?[edit]

I think it behooves whoever marks an article for quality issues to put forth some discussion on the issues they want to be addressed, and how the article could be better. Personally, I see nothing wrong with the level of detail presented in this article. It seems only mildly excessive to list each development code name of a piece of software that has had annual releases since its inception, but the fact that it has had new releases with such regularity I do find of interest. It also seems incongruent to mark an article as a stub and then also mark it for excessive detail. Wikipedia really needs to get its act together on how it's going to document software. Personally, I'd rather see errors of excess rather than omission. Dlw20070716 (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I would say a piece of history would be welcome. By the way, the version list is outdated: last 3Delight major version is 10, not 9. --Hibou57 (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 3Delight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)