It's not the usual practice to include a comma in titles of number articles. I'm curious why it's been included here. 4pq1injbok 16:28, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I've moved it to fit in with the pattern of all the other number articles, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to have the redirect with the comma. I've also added a Docuan table and a mathematics section, but admittedly I had nothing interesting to say in it. PrimeFan 21:48, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Conceivably, any number containing 69 would be related to the position connotated by that number. Is it necessary, then, to include the comment about it? Or was it actually mentioned in the "Passages" book?
I'll take it out until we know. FuzzyOnion 20:25, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
- It was actually mentioned in the Passages book as an influence on the number. Marnanel 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I do not see how an article about an recurring element from video games, with little or no content unrelated to video games, is not within the scope of WP:VG. Even were the article to contain much unrelated content, if a reasonable amount were about VGs then it would be in the scope. The template does not mean "this article is about a video game". It means this article is "video game-related". ~ JohnnyMrNinja 20:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)