Talk:7aum Arivu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Edit request on 30 May 2012[edit]

The Visual Effects were completed and handled by Makuta VFX, Hyderabad, not Legacy Effects as incorrectly reported. www.makutavfx.com

183.83.36.152 (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Not done you need to source this before it can be considered; additionally it would be helpful if you could specify exactly what text you want taking out and what text you want putting in. Egg Centric 00:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 June 2012[edit]

Box Office: 98 crore[1] Jokerjam90 (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

IMDB is unreliable. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Cant agree with you more websites like Kollyinsider and IMDB are a big non sense who have no idea on how box office works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravin.murthy (talkcontribs) 08:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

References

vandalism by kart777[edit]

kart777 has vandalized this article by adding unreliable kollywoodinsider source ,pls revert it to the old proper version122.174.31.137 (talk) 08:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

"Declared a hit"[edit]

In this edit I reverted good faith changes made by Rcrox in which he removed sourced content in favor of unsourced subjective fluff "the film was declared a hit at the box office". These assertions do not have any meaning to an encyclopedia because they are entirely subjective. Who declared it a hit? And what does "hit" mean? What we should be talking about is objective data. Gross vs. budget, marketing and distribution costs. Do we know what the actual profit was, or are we speculating? Phrases like "hit", "super-hit", "blockbuster" have no place in an encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Re: this resubmission of the contested content, even if attributed, "hit" is still meaningless. If you want say that it was profitable, that'd be fine, (if sourced) because it's an objective description. But "hit"? What does that mean? That's like calling the film "gorgeous". It doesn't make it a fact regardless of whether or not a reliable source declared it as such. For a real-world parallel, we don't say "Film X was declared rotten" simply because RottenTomatoes.com found low critical approval. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 7aum Arivu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)