Talk:Aaron Cook (taekwondo)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move disambig to undisambiguated name. Andrewa (talk) 12:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

Aaron Cook (taekwondo athlete)Aaron Cook — More notable than the baseball pitcher as per google hits — Traumatised (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Oppose - prefer to move the main Aaron Cook title to be a disambiguation page, with both the Olympian and the baseball player having identifiers in their article names. They seem roughly equally notable to me at present. - fchd (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Aaron Cook (baseball pitcher) actually seems to be more notable than Aaron Cook (taekwondo athlete). Granted, Aaron Cook (taekwondo athlete) has a longer article, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's more notable. It just means more work has been done to his article. Also, if you simply type in Aaron Cook in various search engines, the baseball pitcher seems to dominate the search results, especially on the first page. I think Aaron Cook (baseball pitcher) should be moved back to Aaron Cook. Furthermore, I don't know if this is critical to mention, but the user that requested this move was recently indefinitely blocked, and the person behind that account may be the same person behind another blocked account. You can see the details at his talk page. -- Luke4545 (talk) 20:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose I agree with fchd and Una Smith that there's no primary topic. Also, Luke4545, you have to be careful with the order of Google hits because Google's U.S. page (the one you're directed to if you connect from the U.S.) gives higher ratings to U.S. webpages. I suggest you try the same experiment from google.co.uk. Joeldl (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Multiple issues[edit]

THIS IS POOP. Sorry, but it is. It needs editing, badly, by someone far more knowledgable about the sport than me, and FAST! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calledsambyall (talkcontribs) 15:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)