Talk:Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 2, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
June 26, 2012 WikiProject A-class review Approved
Did You Know
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Background, "Nikephoros assembled his army and marched out himself to meet a second, larger invasion under the Caliph himself." Is there any way to avoid the repetition of "himself"?
    • The campaign, "(gazi, hajj)" What is this supposed to mean?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Sources all look good, no indication of OR or copyvio.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Other than a couple of minor prose issues (detailed above), I can find nothing of issue in this article. Because of that, I am passed it to GA as is; I hope that the issues I list above will be rectified, but in my opinion they do not reflect on the article's readability to the point of preventing it from being listed as a GA. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)