Talk:Abortion Act 1967

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

NPOV[edit]

May I suggest that the description of abortion, in the first paragraph, as 'medical aid' is not neutral as it appears to be a positive description. May I suggest simply replaking it with the word 'abortions'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.4.76 (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I have used the term "medicalizing practises" instead. Is this acceptable to you? Road Wizard (talk) 07:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

OAPA 1861[edit]

The following provisions of the 1967 Act had been set out in the Article on the Offences Against the Person Act 1861:

"when a pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner if two registered practitioners are of the opinion, formed in good faith..." that one of four sets of circumstances apply, notably s.1(1)(d): "...that there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped."

I have moved them here because they do not really belong there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.4.76 (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Misspelling[edit]

In the second paragraph there is a reference to the ROCG committee. Is this a misspelling of RCOG (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists)?

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1506770/Sir-John-Peel.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Neljack (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abortion Act 1967. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)