Talk:Academic dishonesty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


examples[edit]

From Time Immemorial, J Peters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_Time_Immemorial Arming America http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arming_America Reinhoff Rogart http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.51.31 (talk) 02:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academic dishonesty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Academic dishonesty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Confusion between fabrication and falsification[edit]

The article currently conflates fabrication with falsification, but they are two completely separate things. Falsification is tweaking or omitting the results of an experiment. Fabrication is making up results from imagined experiments that never took place.

See for example [1], [2], etc.

The confusion appears several times in the article, so for now I'm just bringing this up and hoping someone involved in the article can express his opinion and/or fix this. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

My initial impression is that this is hair-splitting. One area of difficulty is that falsification has another meaning — to demonstrate the falseness of a proposition or hypothesis — so some writers may choose to avoid using it in this context as potentially confusing. One could argue that any data or results that are not in correspondence with actual experiments are fabricated while still being able to distinguish the extreme of fabricated from whole cloth, i.e. results attributed to experiments that were never done.
Those two links are evidence that your view has a certain currency, though. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 20:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Academic dishonesty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)