Talk:AceProject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Websites / Computing  (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Software / Computing  (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).
 


Untitled[edit]

First off, could you elaborate on what is promotional in this article? Secondly, if this article is promotional, how come all the products listed on the Comparison_of_project_management_software page haven't been flagged as promotional too? I'd like to hear you on this.

I believe AceProject deserves a Wikipedia page, just like all products in the above-mentioned list. To me, a promotional article contains superlatives and uses sales-oriented language. This very article is informational as it provides facts about the product and the organization behind it.

Project22 (talk) 12:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be a preceding comment, but the tone is why I came to the talk page. I wouldn't call it an entirely promotional article, but I see some of the language and section titles as questionable. Among other minor bits, these stick out:
  • "Worldwide use" (section) is essentially a client list
  • "...influential worldwide market leaders..."
  • "...reviewed by some eminent magazines..."
Botsnack (talk) 03:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Removed Software as a Service versus In-house paragraph (ad-driven) and one poor quality review.

Project22 (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)