|WikiProject Chemistry||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
|The content of Ketal was merged into Acetal. That page now redirects here. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see ; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.|
The carbon atom shown here only has three bonds. It needs to have a hydrogen on it (for acetals), or another R group (for ketals).
- Missing H on C now fixed. Delta G 15:36, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Why is Glycoside redirected to this article? Nothing currently in the article text mentions glycoside. Could someone knowledgeable make the connection explicit? Thank you. -- Jeff Q 19:40, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I agree the redirect was not obvious. I replaced it with a stub that links to glycosidic bond where things get explained in more depth. FYI, the tenuous link was that a glycoside contains an acetal. -- Delta G 14:39, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
how do you properly pronounce????
- three syllables, ass-e-tal 188.8.131.52 01:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Acetal formation image
An IP left this comment in the article and I'm moving it here:
"This picture is incorrect: it starts with a ketone, therefore this is a ketal, not an acetal."
- In modern terminology (now explained in the article), "ketal" is a more specific category within "acetal" rather than being two separate types that differ by ketone-vs-aldehyde. DMacks (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- I added a note about thermal expansion. acetal is terrible for this. polyprop would be a better alternative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- AREN'T ACETLAS A SUBSET OF KETALS NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 07:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. I just added a link to the Gold Book ref for "ketals", which states "a subclass of acetals." DMacks (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge Acetalisation into Acetal?
One is a reaction, the other is the product of the reaction. There is not much content on the product, and actually a large part of the product article is about the reaction that makes it. Much of what's important about the product seems to be (or at least is highly related to) the specific chemistry of it, i.e., the reaction that forms it. Perhaps some day someone will write tons of material about one or the other enough to merit separate articles, but for now seems like it's duplicated content and/or closely related important content spread over multiple places. DMacks (talk) 12:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)