Talk:Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, I can't help but take another! JAGUAR  19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Why is Thomaskantor italicised? I've seen it unitalicised and uncapitalised before!
    The lead summarises the article
    A suggestion, I think Thomaskantor (director of music) should be explained in other Bach articles, but I'll get to that when the time comes!
    "but may be raised to joy in a "seliger Tod"" - what is Tod?
    " (Ah, dear Christians, be comforted),[1]Bach expresses" - space needed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Once again, I couldn't find anything major to make this be put on hold. Nice work! JAGUAR  18:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]