Talk:Action Button Entertainment/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 23:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


Failed because I don't like you. Sorry.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose (Symbol question.svg) 1b. MoS (Symbol question.svg) 2a. ref layout (Symbol support vote.svg) 2b. cites WP:RS (Symbol support vote.svg) 2c. no WP:OR (Symbol support vote.svg) 3a. broadness (Symbol support vote.svg)
3b. focus (Symbol support vote.svg) 4. neutral (Symbol question.svg) 5. stable (Symbol support vote.svg) 6a. free or tagged images (Symbol question.svg) 6b. pics relevant (Symbol support vote.svg)
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked Symbol comment 2.png are unassessed


Just kidding. I think it's pretty close; just look at these comments:

  • "Their games are consistently simple in their aesthetics and controls" - Possibly POV; I'd shroud this in something to the effect of the developer designing the games to be that way.
  • "mocked up" - What does this mean?
  • In TNNS's section, why is Pocket Gamer's reviewer first just called "Pocket Gamer" and later "Pocket Gamer's Mark Brown"? I'd use the second of those first and refer to him subsequently as "Brown".
  • Why don't Ten by Eight and TNNS have some kind of images?
  • Why doesn't the studio itself have an image?

This should be most of them, but I'll be back later. Tezero (talk) 23:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Back. More:

  • Videoball's section needs more of a traditional introduction like the other three have rather than jumping straight into the gameplay.
  • Ten by Eight looks like it could be expanded with regards to reception.
  • I would stick all four of the games as subheaders under a level-2 section titled "Games" or "Titles".

That really is it. I'll put the article on hold. Tezero (talk) 23:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Tezero, ah, I suppose you don't have to like me, but I do hope we'll be able to work together in the future. I believe I've addressed the above—take a look? As mentioned on the Ziggurat talk page, Rogers is sending in-game assets soon—caught up in E3 and whatnot this week. czar  01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I'll trust you to get those assets when the time comes and pass the article under that premise. If there's something you want to collaborate on, I can do that, although I don't notice our interests here overlapping that much within WP:VG. I'm not even sure whether I don't like you or anyone else, but that doesn't matter. The page is ready. Tezero (talk) 02:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)