Talk:Adi Da

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Adi Da has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
October 5, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed
January 30, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed
September 27, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

Untitled[edit]

Welcome to the Adi Da Talk page. Please add new content under old content. Please start new sections at the bottom of the page. Please use colon to indent added discussion. Thank you!

A Classic Example of the Wikipedia concept of References[edit]

There are certain claims by "Adi Da" that give him gravitas that are false... but... they are documented here by "references" (ooohhh aaahhh) which are simply books that quote Adi Da making the false claim.

My knowledge is first hand, I know people directly in all the organizations involved, but since I have not written a book, it's "Original Research" (hisssss) and so how can I contradict a book ? I'd like to just insert the word "allegedly" but I think that will simply be deleted by the next Adi Da fan who reads it.

A lot of the page is clearly written by Adi Da fans, as ironically the text of the page casts doubt on other teachers in exactly the same way, lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.122.66.138 (talk) 22:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I guess it's in the eyes of the beholder; although if you read carefully, you'll see how every claim he or others make is couched that way, which is to say they are claims, not independent realities. As emphatically NOT an Adi Da fan, I worked pretty hard fighting, and working WITH, many quite dogmatic devotees to get this page into a neutral shape. It used to read as a straight up Adidam pamphlet. I ended up reading about 30 sources (that's just books; dozens more web sources), including all independent appraisals and histories out there, to get a full picture of this guy (whom I consider utterly pathological, and pretty much a menace.) I feel that conclusion (he's nuts) is fully possible from reading this entry - as is thinking he might indeed be the sole embodiment of God, if you are open to such notions (anyone who believes he is the most enlightened being who ever lived, as this article clearly states he claimed, is in mine and I think most people's eyes either pathologically lying or profoundly psychologically broken.) It's been reviewed numbers of times by senior editors, who finally signed off on it as a "Good" page, which is quite an accomplishment if you know how that works. If you have new sources, or specific points you'd like to discuss, bring it, by all means! Otherwise...Tao2911 (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
This might be a reference to "He then returned to India for a month-long visit in early 1969, during which Swami Muktananda authorized him to initiate others into Siddha Yoga." First, "Siddha Yoga" did not exist until 1974. Second, Da's claim is that Muktananda appeared in his mind in a vision and told him to teach (in "Knee of Listening" which I no longer own). There is no corroboration of this from Muktananda or his group, and all other people who taught on Muktananda's behalf were told to do so verbally. 162.205.217.211 (talk) 20:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

(To the above, I have a 1973 copy of The Knee of Listening, using the words "Siddha Yoga" as taught by Baba Muktananda, so this term was in use before 1974. Fact Check) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.86.124 (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adi Da. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Adi Da. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)