Talk:Adulthood (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fair use rationale for Image:Adulthoodextrasap4.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Adulthoodextrasap4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Terribly written article[edit]

I came here to read about the film, and was shocked by how badly written this page is. I don't care enough to re-write it myself, but, in the hope that the author is reading, please try proofreading. "Jay makes Sam beg just like what Trife did". SERIOUSLY?! Did you learn about sentence structure at scchool? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Plot synopsis[edit]

I think the plot synopsis reads like it was taken from promotional materials for the film. As a result, it's not very helpful and raises several issues related to Wikipedia policy. Can someone who has seen the film fix this, please? (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not the official synopsis as the official, UK, one is 4 paragraphs long. Even so the production notes allow the use of the synopsis " reproduce this text [the production notes] in articles publicizing the distribution of the Motion Picture" Confused coyote (talk) 08:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

When I came to the article, there were bizarrely two Plot sections, an I.M.D.B.-summary-type one and the badly written stuff indicated above. I haven't tried to make the section good (as it's too long since I saw the film and I don't know where else to research it), but I've at least combined the sections as best as was practical, and removed the outright spelling/punctuation/grammar errors from the second part. Salopian (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)