Talk:Affective neuroscience

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Psychology (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Neuroscience (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Please note that there are only about 10 studies cited between 2012-2019. The newer research changes many of the perspectives presented in this article. For example, the section relating to emotions and the right hemisphere refer mainly to studies prior to 2006, and these models have been abandoned in favor of the new evidence showing interhemispheric connectivity and the role that the salience network plays in interpreting instinctual emotional responses to the world. Panksepp's more recent work has not been included; a major oversight considering he is one of the founders of affective neuroscience. researchfellow —Preceding undated comment added 19:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Neuroscience?![edit]

Why is this under psychology and not neuroscience??Grouphug (talk) 06:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

It is, now! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Why isn't Jaak Panksepp cited? Didn't he coin the term? According to this interview, he did. http://docartemis.com/brainsciencepodcast/2010/01/bsp-65-panksepp/ --Lisah2u (talk) 23:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

This is an appallingly biased and incomplete treatment. You've left out main authors, particularly Panksepp, and the entire article is focused on the debate about whether there is such a thing as primary categories of motion, but the full debate in a sense is not included, or the evidence base for it. This reads like a college essay not any version of a professional encyclopedia. This is coming from someone who was written, taught, and published in this area of affective neuroscience for over 20 years. It needs a lot of work, and it should not be considered anything but a very incomplete treatment in need of updating and a lot of editing. 24.218.21.185 (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Main Structures in the Limbic System[edit]

Njbetz (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Affective neuroscience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)