Talk:After Dark (software)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other After Darks[edit]

This information might be useful but this article is about the Berkeley Systems' After Dark screen savers. The gay publication and drag group probably deserve their own After Dark pages, with an After Dark disambiguation page.

Also, don't forget to cite your sources. A sourced article will never be mistaken for vandalism.

HarrisX 18:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lunatic Fringe[edit]

Lunatic Fringe is not in After Dark Games. I'm going to remove it from the article. And the picture.

Well, I've definitely played Lunatic Fringe. How else would I have gotten that screenshot? I believe it came with the pack "More After Dark" for the Mac, so it was treated as a screensaver, but it IS fully playable. ~ Oni Lukos _c _t 21:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I had just read that part out of context. I see now that it does mention that Lunatic Fringe was fully playable...however, the image should still probably be placed somewhere. Hmm...I bet I could get a picture of the Flying Toasters... ~ Oni Lukos _c _t 21:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to post a pic of a toaster. It's okay.

Ya, but it's a NON flying toaster. Fatandlazy11 17:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It IS marked as a flightless toaster, though.--GreatCthulhu 22:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What use is a picture of a flightless toaster to this page? I suggest removing it, but I care very little, so it's there to stay until someone else agrees. I should log in. 69.59.108.79 17:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. It contributes NOTHING to the article. brabblebrex 02:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on the history of AfterDark[edit]

Tommy Thomas has done some interviews with the folks behind AfterDark (both the original Mac version and the Windows version) and posted them here. They might be of use if somone wanted to improve the history section of this article. --BenFranske 05:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JeffersonAirplane-30SecondsOverWinterland(album-cover).jpg[edit]

Image:JeffersonAirplane-30SecondsOverWinterland(album-cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?[edit]

In fact, it was the last time Berkeley ever touched the series. In 1997, the owners sold out to the Sierra On-Line division of CUC International. Joan Blades and Wes Boyd, creators of the Flying Toaster, went on to create MoveOn.org.[2]

I feel that labelling this as selling out is clearly POV. Does anyone have suggestions on how to best re-word this? Dazcha (talk) 00:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

might be a bit old, but how about "Was acquired by the ..." 24.73.210.106 (talk) 14:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Dog TV series[edit]

Some mention should be made of the Bad Dog TV series: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0178125/

71.241.80.24 (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on After Dark (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615052153/http://www.wired.com:80/techbiz/media/news/1997/04/2902 to http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/1997/04/2902

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it safe?[edit]

Regarding After Dark 5.0 links, has anyone confirmed that this is not actually a virus or malware? I'm curious since the last few edits about it all came from the same IP address only a few days ago. Maybe these edits should be undone until it's been confirmed this new version is legitimate. Threyon (talk) 09:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]