This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
A fact from Aircraft maintenance carriers of the Royal Navy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 2 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
This list is too short to be considered for WP:FLC, according to the delegates, and thus I bring it here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Move to "Aircraft maintenance carriers of the Royal Navy"
I suggest this article (having been identified as not really being a list), be moved to the subject title. As present it is coming up in Category:Military history lists incorrectly assessed as articles. Kirill has suggested move it to avoid confusion. Thoughts? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
@Peacemaker67: Since there haven't been any objections, can we go ahead and move the article to the new title? Kirill[talk] 22:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
You can see that I started a GAR. (The history confused me. I thought it was a non-list article that had been converted to a list.) If we can rename this article, as suggested, the GAR will be a moot point as far as I'm concerned. Recommend you try again. – S. Rich (talk) 00:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
As a list article, it does not qualify under WP:GA?. Seems that it did qualify as an article about aircraft maint carriers, but was renamed. It is included in the good topic WP:GT listing, but that criteria requires featured list assessment for all list articles in the topic. I recommend removing this article from the GA listing and starting up a WP:FL? assessment. – S. Rich (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry if I've created some confusion. To restate my concern: If the article is a list, then it cannot be GA. To keep it as part of the Good Topic realm, it needs to be a Featured List (or a GA). So if it is too short for a list, then it needs to be renamed as an article and keep the list designation off of it. I have no qualms about the renaming to an article type name (v. list). And if renamed I would withdraw this GAR. – S. Rich (talk) 07:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
A move/renaming of the article has been requested. Once accomplished, I think we can close this GAR as moot. – S. Rich (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination As the article has been remained, dropping the "List", this criteria for GA is resolved. Delisting. – S. Rich (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I have no objection to renaming it, but some admin will have to do it as there was an earlier attempt to do so according to the move log.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: article moved. Unopposed proposal after more than two weeks. ArmbrustThe Homunculus 08:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually we have a clear agreement from the remarks above which support moving. If a non-admin move can be accomplished, I will so do. If I can't, then there is no need to keep this move request open and a syop should make the move. – S. Rich (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC) After writing this I see that Peacemaker67 tried a move, but the result is a redirect to the List article. I believe the redirect needs to be deleted. Can interested editors assist? Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.