Talk:Akira Kurosawa/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MusicAngels (talk · contribs) 19:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
The current outline to the article looks a little atypical for such a nomination and appears very closely oriented to the Biography of the director rather that his films. Are you able to possibly rework the article outline to a more traditional Wikipedia format for directors? For example, Early life and childhood are usually separated out into a separate section at the beginning. Similarly for Early education. Then your "Biography" section, or appropriate title, could be more closely oriented to the actual films Kurosawa made, which is usually what readers of his biography would be most interested in. Is this something you feel you might be able to pull together?
This message was also sent to the nominating editor's Talk page who has not answered in a week. If no-one can take up the assessment for Kurosawa within 2-3 days then this nomination shall be subject to quick close without further notice. MusicAngels (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- This nomination appears to be a quick fail following no response from the nominating editor in over one week on his Talk page, and no response here from any editor. I shall be notifying the editor on his Talk page later today and closing the nomination as the nominating editor appears to be on an extended break. GA Renomination is possible if someone is willing to do the required reading and to be available for the assessment in the future. MusicAngels (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)