Talk:Alabama's at-large congressional district

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Discrepancy[edit]

In United States Congressional Delegations from Alabama, the only congress that is indicated as having the delegation elected At-large is the 88th.--Appraiser 22:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

  • I've corrected that now. —Markles 10:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't there be an * on 43rd, 44th, 63rd, and 64th? How about changes to the ordinal congresses? The 88th has A/L for the Alabama delegation, whereas the 43rd, 44th, etc. have district numbers.--Appraiser 13:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • On the 43, 44, 63, 64 only one seat was At-large. I've abondoned "*"s on the delegation articles when I've instead been able to note clearly that the seat was at-large. As for the ordinal congresses, those need to be changed. My source for the delegation article is Martis, which I trust. —Markles 13:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • OK; is the table in General ticket now accurate and complete, so I can use it to correct the ordinals and delegation articles?--Appraiser 15:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I have no idea. I did very little work on the current version.—Markles 16:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alabama's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)