Talk:Alienation of affections
|WikiProject Law||(Rated C-class, Low-importance)|
Does "Alienation of affection" have any historical connection with property law?
Under the criticism section....
That quote should be removed if only because of it's stupidity.
If they were having consensual relations in their "own beds" there wouldn't be an issue now would there? And sex doesn't even have to be involved in order to bring the suit. No matter how you slice it , the quote is incorrect and therefore pretty much irrelevant as anything other than some guy's opinion and I thought wiki was supposed to be free of opinion and conjecture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 01:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strongly disagree. You're welcome to add competing quotes, or those that make your point, but the quoted author is a leading critic of the statutes in question,and a brief quote from him on the subject is perfectly appropriate TRATTOOO (talk) 18:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)