Talk:Alliance for Community Media

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability and excessive reliance on sources too closely associated with the subject[edit]

Two days ago, a search for "Alliance for Community Media" identified several relevant sources. I spent much of the past two days adding some of them to Wikidata and adding citations to them to this article.

There is actually a 1996 US Supreme Court decision in a case with a huge title also known as "Alliance for Community Media v. FCC", which probably deserves a paragraph by itself. However, the decision is written in legalese, and I'm not sure I understand it -- and I don't want to take the time now to figure it out. So it appears in a note but not in a paragraph ;-)

There are now 10 notes citing 17 references. Some but not all are publications by local and regional affiliates of ACM.

I think I've adequately addressed the question of notability, and the article no longer relies on the main website associated with the subject of this article. I am therefore removing the banners questioning notability and excessive reliance on sources too closely associated with the subject.

Comments? DavidMCEddy (talk) 17:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]