Talk:Alpha Phi Alpha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former featured article Alpha Phi Alpha is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 25, 2006.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject New York / Cornell University  (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Cornell University (marked as High-importance).
 
WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon Alpha Phi Alpha is part of the Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Greek Life on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project page, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the discussion.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject African diaspora (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 (Rated Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.


Question regarding Section 8: Membership Fee's[edit]

I want to call attention to this particular section. Besides the misspelling of the section's name, I'm not sure that this should be a separate section at all. Perhaps it could be merged with Section 3.1: Membership Intake? The links are also inconsistent with the linking schema of the rest of this article.

Also, should the the actual membership fees be listed at all? I ask on the grounds that a) no other organizations list their membership fees on their respective pages; and b) these fees change from one year to the next.

Thank you, Xon4 (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Please correct the grammar[edit]

The following statement is in the article: "the activities for the fraternity are oversaw by..." and should be stated "the activities of the fraternity are overseen by..." 76.166.131.37 (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Dr.H. Barnes

Yes check.svg Done My pleasure to help keep a Featured Article in tip-top shape! Boogerpatrol (talk) 03:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

greek art depicting fair skinned people[edit]

There is no citation given for this highly contentious opinion. Almost all greek pottery renders figures as black on orange or orange on black, so pottery is a non starter for claims of a 'fair skinned' greek art. Greek marble tends to be of light colouring, but since these were probably painted and have lost pigment, that is not a strong indicator of 'fairness' either. Given that many 'greeks' were in north africa, there needs to be at least a proper academic citation for a general greek depiction of 'fair skin'.

FAR needed[edit]

Citations are inconsistent, there are external jumps, grammatical issues, and missing "as of" dates. Is anyone able to tune up this article to avoid a Featured article review? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Incorrectly formatted or incomplete citations are being added; see WP:WIAFA. Citations need to be completely formatted in a consistent style for FAs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

NPOV dispute Notable hazing incidents[edit]

The statement "There are many lawsuits, suspensions, expulsions, and news stories in existence in regards to misconduct involving Alpha Phi Alpha" is misleading as the term "many" expresses an opinion.

The "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view" states...

Biased statements of opinion can be presented only with attribution. For instance, "John Doe is the best baseball player" expresses an opinion and cannot be asserted in Wikipedia as if it were a fact. It can be included as a factual statement about the opinion: "John Doe's baseball skills have been praised by baseball insiders such as Al Kaline and Joe Torre." Opinions must still be verifiable and appropriately cited.

Another approach is to specify or substantiate the statement, by giving those details that actually are factual. For example: "John Doe had the highest batting average in the major leagues from 2003 through 2006." People may still argue over whether he was the best baseball player. But they will not argue over this.

Avoid the temptation to rephrase biased or opinion statements with weasel words, for example, "Many people think John Doe is the best baseball player." But "Who?" and "How many?" are natural objections. An exception is a situation where a phrase such as "Most people think" can be supported by a reliable source, such as in the reporting of a survey of opinions within the group.

[1]

Rattler98 (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

The statement in contention is a fact, not a opinion. Quite frankly there's mountain of evidence validating that Alpha Phi Alpha is a problematic organization in regards to misconduct and hazing violations. How many examples of these violations do you need for many to apply? Anyone familiar with Alpha Phi Alpha knows this to be truth. After only 15 minutes of research and I found 10 new stories of serious hazing and misconduct violations involving the fraternity. In fact, in 2010 the violations got so bad that the national headquarters stopped all membership intake in a futile attempt to redress the issue.[2].Broadmoor (talk)

Detailing hazing is not the issue. Some of your edits clearly inject non-neutral editorial, and stretch or omit the "facts" to state things actually not said in your citations. A "mountain of evidence" does not need such help. 137.200.32.54 (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

References

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Alpha Phi Alpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY Archived sources have been checked to be working

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)