Talk:Alphonsus Maria de' Liguori
|WikiProject Biography||(Rated C-class)|
|WikiProject Saints||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
I agree that Liguori is an important character. I have come to this article looking for neutral information but was disappointed: the article reads like an apology and dwells largely on an adoring view. Assorted links could help to look up what is meant by a Catholic Saint, a Doctor of the Catholic Church, a Catholic "spiritual writer", a Catholic Congregation, etc. In the Catholic Encyclopaedia Liguori is presented in extenso with no pretense to be neutral; the corresponding external link is missing. --Lupo Manaro 09:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- It might help if you would elaborate on what 'neutral information' would be, or what is problematic about this content other than lacking definitions of terms that are common in Christian scholarship. I think it is straightforward to look up terminology, e.g. by simple Internet searches. -- Newagelink (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Saint Alphonsus' cassock
I'm curious, on some pictures of Saint Alphonsus, why are his cassock and mozzetta blue? I'm pretty sure that blue was never a colour for cassocks -- only white, red, purple and black were permitted. I thought it might be the colour of Saint Alphonsus' order's habit, but I don't think the CSSRs ever had blue. Saint John Neumann was a bishop too, and all I've seen him in was either a black cassock (I think it's a Jesuit-style cassock?) and the black Bishop's cassock.J.J. Bustamante 11:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Alphonsus Mary Antony John Cosmas Damian Michael Gaspard de' Liguori ...should his complete name be in the article? It's in the italian wikipedia.
Soulrefrain 03:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Carl.bunderson 19:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Great! Kindly check out how I placed the complete name in the article and please provide comments. Thanks. Soulrefrain 00:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think it turned out great. Thanks, Soul. Carl.bunderson 21:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Case of bilocation
Why isnt the incidence of bilocation, reported here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ mentioned in this page? It seems like such a miracle should be mentioned someplace in the article.