Talk:Altera Quartus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing / Hardware (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (marked as Low-importance).

Proposed merge from SOPC Builder[edit]

I don't believe there is any point for each individual program distributed with Quartus II to receive its own page; shouldn't they all be described here, anyway? If there's a substantial amount of information about any it should obviously have a page just so we don't have that much information, but the SOPC Builder page is quite short and could just as easily be included here. Any comments? JulesH (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I prefer them to be separate just for visibility on 'term'. For example; when looking for information on MS-Word it may be better as far as visibility and scope to have MS-Word separate from MS-Office which would be separate from MS-Windows. However; I totally agree/suggest that the SOPC Builder and Quartus pages should have links to each other and well stated that SOPC Builder is distributed with Altera Quartus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I've merged SOPC Builder into this since SOPC Builder fails WP:N and does not deserve a separate article. Personal preferences are irrelevant. -- Wonderfl (reply) 14:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quartus Prime[edit]

Quartus II seems to be depreciated. shouldnt this article reflect that quartus II is depreciated an link to another on quartus prime..... or cover quartus I, quartus II, and quartus prime in different subsections including their differences.

here's the link to Quartus Prime:

also the link to quartus II in the article is no longer valid and needs updated, but wasn't sure if I should simply change it to the quartus prime page. (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC) ejf

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Altera Quartus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)