Talk:Alternative versions of Doctor Doom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Comics / Marvel (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
 

2099[edit]

Having Doom 2099 as a separate article violates WP:Fancruft, so please don't unmerge it from this article. Thanks. Freak104 16:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:Fancruft is an essay and not even a guideline. As I've said here having such a list as this doesn't mean every version should be merged here. (Emperor 00:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC))

Doom 2099 Survey[edit]

I am posted merge tags and wanted to start the discussion, similar to what is being done on the Hulk and Spider-man Alternate version discussions.

  • No Merge - Doom 2099 appeared in his own series and was one of the launching titles for 2099 imprint. Though similar, they are wholly separate characters. The series itself left unresolved whether Doom 2099 was in fact Victor Von Doom, Kristoff Vernard, or another character altogether. The characters of 2099 represent a distinctive imprint, and unlike fancruft Doom 2099 has an established and lengthy publication history. Doom 2099 deserves mention, but not to be merged wholly into this article. 66.109.248.114 20:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • No merge - I mostly agree with 66.109.248.114. --Lkseitz 02:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  • No merge I was wrong to merge them originally. Sorry. Freak104 02:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion closed with consensus of no merge. 66.109.248.114 08:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Otto von Doom.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Otto von Doom.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:UltDoom.PNG[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:UltDoom.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Doom-2099.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Doom-2099.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

B-Class Assesment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Doom Zombie[edit]

Though I own the issue where Doom becomes a zombie, I do not understand the page's motive explaining why Doom does not eat Ash. In fact, I recall that it was simply Doom didn't want to lose his mind and endanger the few Latverians still going through the portal. But I could be wrong. Lots42 (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)