Talk:Analog Devices/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Analog Devices. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
this is an important company-please do not delte the article, improve it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.207.225.127 (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Section "products"
I don't see the need to write this section as prose. A main problem of Wikipedia is the constant dilemma of achieving structure by an unstructured organization. This basically leads to completely different styles of articles about things and people of a similar "kind". It also leads to inconsistent repetition of article about the same things. Having a list of products here, which will eventually link to fully explanatory articles, is a better approach than re-re-re-writing and re-re-re-explaining what a certain thing is. So I fully disagree with the comment to use prose here. 84.163.152.224 (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
This section read like a laundry-list of marketing jargon and advertorial language. Re-wrote to include references and provided context.Smmgeek (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Remove speedy deletion flag?
I see that other users have contributed and looks like karebear_1022 deleted a bunch of the market segment sections and cleaned up language. Thoughts on removing flag? TechGeek70 (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. I removed a bunch of sections last week that were too self promotional. Think the remaining content with refs makes it neutral. Karebear 1022 (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Removed flag since karebear_1022 agreed and removed the promotional sections. TechGeek70 (talk) 21:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)