|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia||(Rated Stub-class)|
|WikiProject Australia||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Predictions a posteriori
I added a small paraghraph about the so-called predictions of Prentice.
Refer also to J.Monaghan, 1995, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995EM&P...71...73M - luxorion
- Any such material needs to be carefully written in view of WP:BLP. The second of the added paragraphs is particularly problematic. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
You listed a selected choices of predictions but have ignored ALL failed predictions... Is it a so that works the ""objectivity" of wikipedia ?.... I doubt.
It is a pity that the comments of a scientist, even duly referenced, are refused by "Wikipedia" but that those of amateurs are validated. Where is the so-called "objectivity" ? - luxorion